🔗 Share this article

Deductibles. Preferred providers. Non-preferred providers. Concierge medical services. Personal healthcare costs. Co-payment. Co-insurance. Insurance consultants. Coverage agents. Medical advisors. ACA. Health Maintenance Organization. Preferred Provider Organization. Exclusive Provider Organization. Point of Service. HDHP. Health Savings Account. FSA. HRA. Explanation of Benefits. COBRA. SHOP. Individual coverage. Family coverage. Premium tax credits.

Confused? You should be. Who understands all this stuff? Certainly not the average entrepreneur. Nor the typical employee. Choosing the appropriate healthcare insurance for our business – or for households – appears to require it requires advanced expertise in medical insurance.

Our Medical System Isn't Just Complex, It Is Expensive

Based on a recent study, typical households spends $twenty-seven thousand each year on medical coverage (up 6% compared to last year). The average company healthcare expense is expected to exceed $seventeen thousand per employee by 2026, a 9.5% jump from 2025.

Currently federal operations is shut down due to political disagreements regarding subsidies which analysts predict will lead to a doubling of premiums for numerous US citizens.

When Will We Truly Examine National Health Insurance?

When will we genuinely evaluate a national health insurance program in the United States? I have to believe we're approaching that point because this situation is unsustainable.

I'm not suggesting government-run medicine. I'm proposing for our current Medicare system – an established insurance framework – merely extend to include all citizens. The existing system doesn't change. How our healthcare providers get paid would change. Believe me, they'll adapt.

The Way Universal Coverage Would Work

A national health insurance program would require contributions from employees and employers. In comparable systems, a worker making moderate income pays about five point three percent to their healthcare. Their employer pays about 13.75%.

Does this appear expensive? Unless you compare it to what the typical American pays. I can name multiple clients that are routinely paying anywhere from 8% to 15% of their employee wages for medical benefits. And keep in mind that with inclusive programs, these contributions also cover retirement benefits, illness coverage, maternity leave and job loss protection in addition to supporting medical services. When you add these expenses versus our current spending on retirement programs, unemployment insurance and vacation benefits, the gap narrows.

Execution in the US

In the US, a national health premium would raise existing Medicare taxes, a system that is already in place. It ought to be income-adjusted – wealthier individuals would contribute higher amounts than lower-income earners. This includes both worker and company payments. Similar to much of federal military, technology, social programs and infrastructure, the system could be managed to third-party administrators instead of federal agencies.

Benefits for Entrepreneurs

Universal healthcare coverage would be a huge benefit for entrepreneurs such as my company. It would put us on a level playing field with our larger competitors who can afford superior coverage. It would render management significantly simpler (automatic payroll withholding remitted like social security and Medicare taxes, rather than individual transactions to benefit firms and insurance providers).

It would enable it easier to plan expenses annual expenditures, instead of going through the complicated (and ineffective) process of bargaining with major insurers that we must do every year. Because it's simplified, there would be improved comprehension of coverage by our employees – as opposed to existing arrangements which require them to interpret the complications of current options. Additionally there would certainly be reduced responsibility for companies since we wouldn't have access to workers' health histories for risk assessment and different options.

Free-Market Viewpoint

I'm as capitalist as they get. However I recognize that public institutions has a significant role in our lives, from providing defense to supporting essential systems. Ensuring medical coverage for everyone via universal healthcare strengthens economic foundations. It's a better, simpler approach for small businesses which hire the majority of American employees and fund half of our GDP. It enables for workers to be healthier, have better attendance and be more productive.

Addressing Concerns

Are there a million considerations I haven't covered? Of course there are. But with rising medical expenses experienced recently, it's evident that the Affordable Care Act isn't functioning very well. And I realize that America isn't a compact European nation where big changes are easier to implement. However extending universal Medicare, despite the additional taxes that would be incurred, would remain a superior and more affordable strategy for not only managing medical expenses and ensuring coverage to everyone.

Need for Honest Assessment

We as Americans, must reduce our own arrogance. Our healthcare system isn't exceptional. The US places well below many other countries with the best healthcare globally, according to major studies. Maybe one bright spot amid present circumstances could be that we undertake a hard look in the mirror and agree that major reforms need to happen.