🔗 Share this article

Via an unattributed order, the highest judicial body permitted Texas to implement a newly configured congressional boundary scheme that may create up to five additional Republican-leaning districts. The 6-3 ruling, issued on Thursday, approves a petition by the state to set aside a federal judge's injunction that had rejected the boundaries in November.

Court's Rationale

The lower court erroneously placed itself into an ongoing primary campaign, generating much confusion and disrupting the sensitive equilibrium in elections, the order stated in explaining its decision.

That lower court had previously found that Texas had probably sorted voters according to their race – a act known as unconstitutional racial sorting – when it adopted the new maps. It had ordered the state to use the districts drawn after the 2020 census for the upcoming election.

Strong Dissent

With a sharply worded dissent, Justice Elena Kagan objected to the court's ruling. She stated that it undermined the work of the district court, observing that its decision was written by a judge selected by ex-President Donald Trump.

We are a higher court than the district court, but we are not a better one when it comes to making such a fact-based decision, Kagan wrote in a dissent supported by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

Kagan added, This court's stay ensures that Texas's new map, with all its boosted partisan advantage, will control next year's elections. And it means that many Texas citizens, unjustly, will be placed in electoral districts because of their race. And that result, as this court has declared repeatedly, is a violation of the U.S. Constitution.

Countrywide Map-Drawing Fight

This decision comes amid a countrywide contest over the redistricting of electoral maps. Texas is an essential part in efforts to alter the U.S. House map to bolster a slim Republican hold. Usually, redistricting takes place after a ten-year survey. Yet the action by Texas Republicans to initiate a brazen mid-cycle redistricting earlier this year set off a series of events among other states.

Conservative legislators in states like North Carolina and Missouri have also passed redistricting plans that could add several more GOP-friendly seats. Democratic lawmakers, for their part, have pushed back with their own plans in states like California and Virginia, which might neutralize those projected gains.

Political Responses

The Texas attorney general praised the High Court's decision. In a comment, he said the order protected Texas's basic authority to draw a map that secures electoral outcomes aligned with Republicans. Texas is paving the way as we take our country back, district by district, state by state, he stated.

Conversely, opposition party representatives criticized the ruling. The Court's approval of this extreme, racially gerrymandered Texas GOP map is profoundly disappointing, said the head of a major Democratic campaign committee.

A leading Democratic figure stated the court had once again shredded its credibility by rubber-stamping a racially gerrymandered map. Tonight's ruling by far-right justices on the supreme court is further proof that the extremists will do anything to rig the midterm elections. The gerrymandered Texas congressional map is a partisan and racially discriminatory power grab designed to subvert the will of the voters – particularly in Black and Latino communities, he added.