🔗 Share this article

In today's Britain, protest is no longer a basic freedom. Instead, it has become a privilege that those in power allow or withhold at their discretion. This constitutes the underlying meaning of new regulations that the current government is advancing, which would determine when and where demonstrations can take place, with possible prison sentences for those who disobey these limitations.

Erosion of Civil Liberties

Previous administrations had already undermined this fundamental freedom: the former Conservative government had given law enforcement sweeping new authorities, which international human rights organizations had censured as "serious and unjustified limitations" on civil liberties. Taken together, these progressive assaults on freedom have practically abolished the historically earned right to public demonstration.

Using Atrocity to Justify Suppression

The most recent restrictive measures are being defended by citing last week's heinous antisemitic attack on a British Islamic center. We can all agree on widespread consensus that the security of Jewish communities in Britain must be protected. However, employing this horrific incident as a justification to suppress opposition is not only unrelated to that responsibility but distorts it.

"When you cannot set boundaries at genocide, you probably can't establish limits at democracy," commented a well-known American author, a statement that applies equally for the current government.

Historical Context of Demonstration

Consider Britain's long tradition of protest and activism against racism and fascism, from the historic 1936 Cable Street confrontation to postwar Jewish anti-fascist movements and the 1970s demonstrations against the far-right organization. Many of these early protesters were labeled as extremists in their time, even while they were fighting for the freedoms of minorities.

Present Situation

In the current complicated landscape, here's what's actually occurring: Israel – a foreign state – is perpetrating what United Nations investigations have characterized as systematic destruction. Its military actions have prompted the global justice body to release legal indictments against Israel's prime minister and his ex-military leader.

Western popular sentiment has changed significantly against Israel's violent actions. In Britain, a substantial majority of citizens think Israel has likely committed war crimes. Most people would endorse a complete ban on weapons exports to the state, and approve the detention of Netanyahu.

Silencing Dissent

Having essentially lost the argument, Israel's supporters are now seizing on a vile anti-Jewish attack to try to silence a popular campaign against a moral catastrophe. The British government appears to be involved in this attempt. Ministers have failed to implement extensive restrictions on Israel and have allowed arms exports to continue.

People who are demonstrating against the erasure of Gaza have been characterized as hateful extremists. Yet there's a important factor why there hasn't been a broader suppression on these protesters until now: extremely few protesters have made genuinely hateful statements about Jewish people, giving law enforcement little justification to take action.

Problematic Association

Merging Jewish heritage with the policies of the Israeli state is not only manipulative but also harmful. The standard interpretation of anti-Jewish prejudice, adopted by the British government and many organizations, has been rightly questioned for potentially restricting legitimate criticism of Israel. However, there should be universal agreement about one of its key examples: that "making Jewish people collectively responsible for decisions of the state of Israel" constitutes prejudice against Jews.

Increasing Limitations

This is why we've arrived at a situation where police authorities can propose that demonstrations opposing Israel's policies should be canceled because they might "accidentally or deliberately" endorse anti-Jewish sentiment. Similarly, government officials have stated that recognition of Palestinian statehood has made organizations "implicated" in supposed mistreatment experienced by Jewish communities.

Inconsistent Treatment

On the very day as the synagogue attack, the Israeli military killed dozens of Palestinians in Gaza – increasing the terrible count from two years of daily atrocities that have taken many thousands of lives. British politicians and news organizations have hardly hidden the minimal importance they assign to Palestinian life. This represents one of the most brazen demonstrations of racism in our time.

Crossing Thresholds

Our government has already crossed a dangerous threshold by proscribing a specific activist group, a peaceful, human rights-focused direct action organization. Multiple thousands of British demonstrators have been detained, primarily for carrying signs against mass killing and endorsing the banned organization. Many of those arrested are elderly citizens; among them a retired priest and the daughter of a Holocaust survivor.

International Parallels

It's easy to see where this path leads. In the United States, government officials helped vilify demonstrations supporting Palestine: a former House Speaker implied that some were "linked with" other nations, while the current president described such demonstrations as anti-Jewish. In taking these actions, they contributed to normalizing the authoritarian crackdown on such demonstrations – and on freedom of expression in general.

Looking Ahead

If a conservative administration comes to power, it would be granted sweeping powers to control dissent. What might a new administration do with this repressive toolkit? Our forebears fought, suffered and sacrificed their lives to establish our freedoms. We may ultimately rue how easily we permitted them to slip away.